The problem of most disputes about the problem of piracy is that in them "value" is estimated only in "monetary" dollars. Therefore, the problem is formulated like this: "When buying a game from us, the user spends money dollars. A pirated copy costs zero money dollars. So most people will pirate the game if they have a choice, so you need to stop them at any cost. "
The dollar is famous for everyone.
This is the error, therefore, at least four currencies, and not one (monetary dollars) should be taken into account here.
I propose the following notation:
($ D) Monetary dollars
($ B) Temporary dollars
($ D) Headache paints [in the original Pain-in-the-butt-dollars]
($ Ч) Honesty Dollars
The player makes the choice to buy or spiratit game based on how much "each" service (and not product! ) costs in these four currencies, and also depending on the value for the player each of them.
Image: TED Conference , CC BY-NC 2.0
In April 2017 published an article Will Gornalla from the University of British Columbia and Ilya Strebulaeva Stanford called "We bring venture business assessments to reality." In it, scientists analyzed the estimates of more than hundreds of world-famous companies (including technological ones) with an estimate of one billion dollars or more (the so-called "unicorns").
It turned out that these estimates do not always correspond to reality and can be repeatedly overstated. We publish the main findings of this study.
The order of evaluation of expressions is determined by a particular implementation, except when the language guarantees a certain order of calculations. If, in addition to the result, evaluating the expression causes changes in the runtime, then the expression is said to have side effects.In our internal newsletter about C #, a regular question arises, which concerns the correct interpretation of such constructions:
a -= a *= a;In response, I ask:
p[x++] = ++x;
Yes, who writes such a code with an imperturbable look? It's one thing when you write this, trying to win at the International COC Contest, or if you want to write a puzzle - but in both cases you realize that you are doing something non-standard. That, there really is someone who writes a - = a * = a and p [x ++] = ++ x; and thinks to himself "Shit, yes I write really cool code! "
[A Friday translation of the 1999 article by one of the authors of the Thief game engine, Sean Barrett]
Unpleasant situation in "Sapper"In this situation, I know that there are a lot of mines around me, but I can not determine where they are. Several mines can be in one of two places (pink or blue), a group of mines can be located in one of two combinations (light / dark green). In addition, there is still a difficult situation with "5" and "6" in the upper left corner, which I did not single out.
Blue / pink - mutually exclusive pair, light / dark green - mutually exclusive group
"Sapper": logic or probabilityIn "Sapper" you can play in two ways: as a logical or probabilistic game.
Technically, probability implies logic. If you can logically prove that the mine must be in a certain place, then the probability is 100%. If you can prove that it is not in this place, then the probability is 0%. That is, in a sense, only probabilities are important to us. However, the player uses logical deduction to recognize such 100% situations. Sometimes, especially at low levels of complexity, it is enough to pass a level, no calculation of probabilities is required.
But there are situations when the whole logic of the world can not save you. A simple example is the situation with the "T", which can be seen down the center. It is slightly complicated by additional neighboring mines. (In the simplest case, "2" is replaced by "1", and "5" - by "3", so that the situation is symmetrical.)
For testing, the code should be selected and copied directly from tweets . - approx. trans.
Here is the snippet:
What would you expect from him?
Here we use the for in loop, which passes through the enumerable properties of the object. Since only the property A is specified, we can assume that the message with the letter A will be shown. Well ... I was wrong. : D
An amusing find was shared today by the user fj333 with Reddit . Analyzing Qualcomm Technologies' proprietary code for Android, which appeared one year ago, he found that an unknown programmer decided to use the sorting with a bubble in production-code in order to find ... maximum in the array.
You can view the original file by under the link to Github or under the cut, and any owner of the device with Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 MSM8610 running Android can estimate it in operation.
As anyone who is familiar with sorting algorithms knows, sorting by a bubble is an educational algorithm, and in industrial code it is usually not used due to its inefficiency ; The matter is that in the worst and average cases it has the complexity O (n2) , besides its capacitive complexity in this case - O (n) . Whom it was not convinced - to use the sorting by a bubble does not recommend even Barack Obama .
And this is all not taking into account the fact that to search for the maximum would be enough and a simple search.
The story of how NASA, ESA, the Danish Technological University, neural networks, decision trees and other good people helped me find the best free hectare in the Far East, as well as in Africa, South America and other "so-so" places.
In this series of articles, I'll talk about the internal Android device - about the boot process, about the contents of the file system, about Binder and Android Runtime, about what they consist of, how the applications are installed, running, interacting with each other, about the Android Framework, and on how Android provides security.
"I experimented with the tasks of the cubic representation in the style of the previous work of Andrew and Richard Guy. The numerical results were amazing ... "( comment on MathOverflow)That's how the retired mathematician Allan MacLeod came across this equation several years ago. And it's really very interesting. Honestly, this is one of the best Diophantine equations I've ever seen, but I did not see very many of them.
I found it when it began to spread like a network-nesting picture-pseudomem, invented by someone's ruthless mind ( Sridhar , was it you?). I did not understand right away what it is. The picture looked like this:
"95% of people will not solve this riddle. Can you find positive integer values? "
You probably already saw similar pictures-memes. It's always the cleanest rubbish, clickbites: "95% of MIT graduates will not decide it!". "She" is some stupid or poorly formulated task, or a trivial warm-up for the brain.
But this picture is completely different . This meme is a clever or malicious joke. Approximately 99.999995% of people have not the slightest chance to solve it, including a good part of mathematicians from leading universities that do not deal with the theory of numbers. Yes, it is solvable, but at the same time it is really complicated. (Incidentally, it was not invented by Sridhar, more precisely, not completely.) See the story in this comment ).
You might think that if nothing else helps, then you can just make the computer solve it. It is very simple to write a computer program to find solutions to this seemingly simple equation. Of course, the computer will find them sooner or later, if they exist. Big mistake . Here the method of simple computer enumeration will be useless.
Providers of the Russian Federation, for the most part, use the systems of deep traffic analysis (DPI, Deep Packet Inspection) to block sites included in the register of banned. There is no single standard for DPI, there is a large number of implementations from different DPI providers that differ in the type of connection and type of work.
There are two common types of DPI connection: passive and active.