Hardware
Raiting:
24

Performance of server disks with SSD caching


We tested several configurations of disk arrays that are suitable for use in servers.
image
We tested the following configurations:
    4 x 300GB SAS2 10K + RAID10 on a PCI-E 2.0 controller (Reference 4 x 300GB RAID10)
    PCI-E SSD 120GB MLC (Inexpensive PCI-E SSD 120GB)
    2 x SSD 120GB MLC + RAID0 on a PCI-E 2.0 controller with optimized firmware (Inexpensive 2 х SSD 120GB RAID0)
    4 x 300GB SAS2 10K + RAID10 on a PCI-E 2.0 controller + SSD MLC 120GB caching I/O (Hybrid 4 x 300GB RAID10 + SSD caching)


The method of comparison
In all tests, we used a server with Microsoft Windows 2008 R2 Enterprise. Performance tested synthetic test Iometer. In comparison, used performance for random read / write blocks of 4KB. It is also estimated the cost of a single I/O operation per second and the cost per GB of usable capacity drives (including the controller).
Random read
image

The graph shows that the use of SSD in any form, rate increases sharply IOPS, which is quite natural. But apart from this reduced the price of one I / O operations per second, and remains low regardless of the type of access to the SSD. If we consider the index price per gigabyte of usable capacity, we see a clear advantage SSD caching. Along with the fact that this system showed the maximum rate IOPS, so also the cost per gigabyte was slightly higher than the conventional disk array. It is also reflected in the chart that the use of a discrete RAID-controller only to realize that a stripe of two SSD - not a budget option.
Random write
image

Operations on random write option was the most productive of the two RAID0 SSD, but it also proved to be the most expensive. Also, be aware that the cost of the solution will have to double to provide fault tolerance with the transition to RAID10. The hybrid array with SSD-caching showed the optimal result for all indicators.
Sequential reading
image

When streaming read operations, as we see ordinary disk array wins for all indicators.
Results
Of course, performance may vary depending on the size of blocks or disks in the array. Just keep in mind that in real applications, in some cases require absolute performance rather than relative price.
But in any case, the use of SSD caching can significantly improve performance I/O operations per second for server disk arrays.
Spy 9 december 2011, 5:34
Vote for this post
Bring it to the Main Page
 

Comments

+1 mistiq December 9, 2011, 6:44
Where reference to the original article?
For you copyright an empty sound?
+2 Spy December 9, 2011, 6:52
Here is a link to the original
+2 v1d0q December 9, 2011, 15:03
Also You could put the link to the source in your article.
+1 harry December 9, 2011, 12:42
As I found in this blog about Performance of server disks with SSD caching. It’s becoming typical now a day. Used performance of read / write blocks of 4KB by Performance tested synthetic test Iometer is showing shocking results.

Leave a Reply

B
I
U
S
Help
Avaible tags
  • <b>...</b>highlighting important text on the page in bold
  • <i>..</i>highlighting important text on the page in italic
  • <u>...</u>allocated with tag <u> text shownas underlined
  • <s>...</s>allocated with tag <s> text shown as strikethrough
  • <sup>...</sup>, <sub>...</sub>text in the tag <sup> appears as a superscript, <sub> - subscript
  • <blockquote>...</blockquote>For  highlight citation, use the tag <blockquote>
  • <code lang="lang">...</code>highlighting the program code (supported by bash, cpp, cs, css, xml, html, java, javascript, lisp, lua, php, perl, python, ruby, sql, scala, text)
  • <a href="http://...">...</a>link, specify the desired Internet address in the href attribute
  • <img src="http://..." alt="text" />specify the full path of image in the src attribute